Silent but dangerous: when absence of noise of cars is a factor


Organisation: ANEC
Date uploaded: 26th October 2010
Date published/launched: August 2010


This position paper by ANEC, the European consumer voice in standardisation, raises concerns about the safety of hybrid and electrical cars, for other road users.

Free
ANEC, the European consumer voice in standardisation, has written a position paper raising concerns about hybrid and electrical cars. The paper says the lack of engine noise means that although these vehicles are better for the environment, they could be more dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists.

No vehicle is completely silent, but electric and hybrid cars are much quieter than most. Their muted engine noises are more difficult to hear, and could mean that pedestrians don’t know they are coming.

Often the quiet running of these cars is seen as a bonus for manufacturers, as the cars can help contribute to quieter neighbourhoods. However, some groups representing pedestrians are concerned about the effect silent cars will have on pedestrian safety.

The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association points out that it is much harder for blind pedestrians to know when a car is approaching. The problem is similar for guide dogs, who also rely on their hearing to judge safe crossing places.

Young children (under 9) are not capable of accurately judging speed and distance. This means that it is hard to judge the speed of oncoming cars. This judgement is even harder when speed can’t be associated with engine noise.

Cyclists are also at risk. Although most cyclists will look before making a manoeuvre, some are reliant on hearing engine sounds to judge whether something is safe.

And people with impaired hearing – older people, those listening to MP3 players, or using mobile phones – are also at increased risk.

For more information contact:
Chiara Giovannini

External links:

Leave a Reply