Organisation: University of Nottingham, Accident Research Unit
Date uploaded: 7th January 2013
Date published/launched: January 2012
To assess the visual skills of drivers in difficult scenarios, this study compared the behaviour of novice and experienced drivers to a group of dual drivers (with both car and motorcycle experience).
To assess the visual skills of drivers in such scenarios this study compared the behaviour of novice and experienced drivers to a group of dual drivers (with both car and motorcycle experience). Participants watched a series of video clips, displayed across three screens, depicting the approach to various t-junctions. On reaching the junction, participants had to decide when it was safe to pull out. Responses and eye movements were measured.
The results confirmed that dual drivers had the safest responses at junctions, especially in the presence of conflicting motorcycles. On a range of visual measures both novice and experienced drivers appeared inferior to dual drivers, though for potentially different reasons. There were however no differences in the time it took all drivers to first fixate approaching motorcycles. Instead the differences appeared to be due to the amount of time spent looking at the approaching motorcycle. The experienced drivers had shorter gazes on motorcycles than cars, suggesting that they either process less salient motorcycles faster than cars, or that they terminated the gaze prematurely perhaps because they did not realise they were fixating a motorcycle. The project team argues that this is potential evidence for an oculomotor basis for Look But Fail To See errors.
For more information contact:
David Crundall
T: 0115 95 15297