Title: Crash data quality for road safety research: Current state and future directions
Organisation: Loughborough University (Transport Safety Research Centre)
Date uploaded: 11th April 2017
Date published/launched: February 2017
Although crash data often suffer from correctness and completeness issues, these are rarely discussed or addressed in crash analyses. Crash reports aim to answer the five “W” questions (i.e. When?, Where?, What?, Who? and Why?) of each crash by including a range of attributes. This paper reviews current literature on the state of crash data quality for each of these questions separately.
The paper also examines the accuracy of crash databases from a number of countries and demonstrates specific examples of crash database errors from four databases: STATS 19 (UK), FARS (US), Australian Road Deaths Database and the Attica Tollway crash database (Greece).
The researchers say the most serious data quality issues appear to be: inaccuracies in crash location and time, difficulties in data linkage (e.g. with traffic data) due to inconsistencies in databases, severity misclassification, inaccuracies and incompleteness of involved users’ demographics and inaccurate identification of crash contributory factors.
The paper shows that the extent and the severity of data quality issues are not equal between attributes and the level of impact in road safety analyses is not yet entirely known. The paper highlights areas that require further research and provides some suggestions for the development of intelligent crash reporting systems.
For more information contact:
Help Forum posts
Child pedestrian with ADHD
Jane Deeley (14.06.17)
Traffic Regualtions Orders around schools.
Sue Whitehead (02.06.17)
Inspection of Rickshaws/Pedicabs
Sandy Allan (01.06.17)
Traffic Regulation Orders for cycle paths on footways
Simon Tranter (01.06.17)
Cycle Helmet Wearing Guidance in Arabic
Michael McDonnell (30.05.17)