Advocacy papers

Title: Essential Evidence (185): The effectiveness of a 20mph speed limit intervention on vehicle speeds in Bristol

Organisation: Travelwest
Date uploaded: 7th May 2019
Date published/launched: April 2019

Free
Top line
The findings indicated that the sign-only 20mph intervention was successful in lowering vehicle speeds. Policy makers are encouraged to implement a careful monitoring of the effects of 20mph speed limit interventions on vehicle speeds in order to enable a meaningful evaluation of potential public health benefits.

More detail
In Bristol, a 20 mph limit scheme was introduced in 7 phases (by electoral wards) between 2010 and 2015 across the city and did not involve the introduction of any physical traffic calming measures. After the successful implementation of a pilot phase in 2010, the lower speed limit was introduced in six further phases between 2014 and 2015. The main aims were reducing road danger; making Bristol healthier, lowering road speeds and making walking, cycling and outdoor play more attractive options; and supporting and building communities.

The lower limit was accompanied by social marketing measures (using advertising and community engagement) that aimed to influence individuals’ attitudes towards speed. The city council undertook a comprehensive programme of vehicle speed monitoring to evaluate the introduction of the 20 mph limits. Speed monitoring sites included 106 roads, with a mix of residential and non-residential, including 77 roads that changed from 30 to 20 mph limits, and 29 that retained the 30 mph limit. Automatic Traffic Counters monitored car speeds for two weeks a year on a 24-h, seven full-day count.

The analysis found that following the introduction of a sign-only 20 mph limit the average adjusted reduction of individual vehicle speeds on those roads which received the intervention was 2.66 mph (4.28km/h) over two to three years, and that the speed reduction was larger at specific times of year/week/day. In addition, it was found that the intervention appeared to have a spill over effect on the roads that remained 30 mph, which saw a general reduction of speed, though of a smaller magnitude than the 20 mph roads.

Finally, the change in speed varied significantly between areas, with a larger reduction in the innermost areas of the city, where the intervention was implemented earlier than other areas. Importantly, the descriptive analysis has shown that compliance to the posted speed limit improved following the intervention in both 20 mph and 30 mph roads.

For more information contact:

External links: