Title: How methods and levels of policing affect road casualty rates
Date uploaded: 9th April 2019
Date published/launched: March 2019
Increasing levels of traffic policing reduces the number of road accidents and traffic violations.
Increases in enforcement will have no noticeable effect at first but at a certain level, when drivers become aware of increased police presence, accidents and casualties can be expected to drop until a saturation point is reached, after which further increases in enforcement levels can be expected to have little or no effect.
On the basis of the literature it is possible to discriminate between stationary and mobile methods of traffic policing. Each method can involve visible policing in marked police vehicles or can involve the use of unmarked vehicles.
Stationary and highly visible policing appears to be the most effective method of reducing violations and accidents. Although stationary enforcement in unmarked vehicles has also been found to be effective, mobile policing methods are less effective, especially when unmarked police vehicles are used.
The effect of increased stationary enforcement of speed limits seem to last for a limited amount of time after the police presence has been removed. The largest time halo effect appears to be 8 weeks. However, sustained police presence is required to produce such large effects. The distance halo effects of stationary policing appear to be in the range of 1.5 miles to 5 miles of the enforcement site.
There is evidence in favour of deploying traffic police largely at random over the whole road network. Theoretically it is likely to increase deterrence. In practice, the random allocation of stationary policing methods to different locations on the road network has been found to be effective, producing substantial impacts on accident rates and reductions in mean speeds and large distance halo effects. The main advantage of this method of traffic policing is that it requires relatively low levels of police enforcement.
Speed cameras have been found to be particularly effective enforcement tools. They appear to be more effective than physical policing methods in reducing mean speeds and accidents. However, the effects of speed cameras appears to be mainly limited to the speed camera site and physical policing methods have still been found to be effective. The minimum distance halo effects associated with physical policing are about 5 times greater than the minimum distance halo effects associated with speed cameras.
Studies of the enforcement of drink-driving violations have also shown that increased policing using random breath testing tends to reduce violations and accidents. Red light running cameras have been found to be effective in reducing violations and accidents. The best estimate for the effects of red light cameras is between 25 to 30% reduction in injury accidents at speed camera sites.
The review referred to in this summary is also included in a wider review of evidence on convictions, violations, policing and deterring found on the Road Safety Observatory website (see link below).
More recent evidence on the effectiveness of specific measures e.g. safety cameras can also be found by searching the Road Safety Observatory.
For more information contact:
Help Forum posts
Who is responsible for making an A road safe to cross
Mr Les Miller (13.06.19)
Marshals - supporting children crossing the road
Colin Savage (12.06.19)
Risky Behaviour (by children)
Mark Bunting (11.06.19)
School Street Closure Trial TTRO
Paul McKenna (04.06.19)
Light Goods/Vans campiagn
Julie Smith (30.05.19)