Title: The Advocacy for Pedestrian Safety Study: Cluster Randomised Trial Evaluating a Political Advocacy Approach to Reduce Pedestrian Injuries in Deprived Communities
Organisation: University College London (Centre for Transport Studies)
Date uploaded: 19th June 2013
Date published/launched: April 2013
The objective of this study was to determine whether advocacy targeted at local politicians leads to action to reduce the risk of pedestrian injury in deprived areas.
Results and conclusions
Primary outcomes did not significantly differ: % difference in traffic calming (0.07), proportion of schools with 20 mph zones (RR 1.47%), Safe Routes to School (RR 1.34%), pedestrian training (RR 1.23%) or other safety education (RR 1.16%).
Intervention group politicians reported greater interest in child injury prevention (RR 1.09%), belief in potential to help prevent injuries (RR 1.36%), particularly pedestrian safety (RR 1.55%). 63% of intervention politicians reported supporting new pedestrian safety schemes. The majority found the advocacy information surprising, interesting, effectively presented, and could identify suitable local interventions.
This study demonstrates the feasibility of an innovative approach to translational public health by targeting local politicians in a randomised controlled trial. The intervention package was positively viewed and raised interest but changes in interventions were not statistically significance. Longer term supported advocacy may be needed.
For more information contact:
Professor Ronan Lyons
Help Forum posts
Travel Training for students with SEN
Jenny Wright (20.02.19)
Accidents involving 60+ pedestrians
Sue Snoddy (19.02.19)
polystyrene egg cycle helmets
Simon Ladbrooke (11.02.19)
Gap Analysis for Pupils Crossing Roads